Getting into the detailed scores
The "Heat Map"-page first gives you an introduction on how to read the Heat Map. Clicking on each of the conclusions displays a different color in the Heat Map, shown below. There is an indication of the overall score (1) which is visible in a colored cell on the bottom right corner of the Heat Map. Conclusion (2) shows the highest and lowest scoring subtopics depicted in the columns. Additional conclusions (3) show the highest and lowest scoring groups, like roles and departments. Conclusion (4) shows how the Heat Map changes from the actual situation to the ambition. Clicking on the pop-out (5) brings you to the Heat Map itself.
The Heat Map itself has various handy navigation options.
First of all, you can click on individual topics and respondent titles in the Heat Map to open or close that section.
Next, four buttons are used very frequently: to collapse or expand the entire Heat Map (2) and to switch between the actual scores and the Ambition scores (1). Additionally, there is a set of filters available (3). With "Topics", you can (un)select topics from being shown. With "Respondents", you can choose the 'angle' with which the respondents are grouped—E.g., per role (like in the Heat Map above) or per department. The 'View"-filter gives you a lot of additional options.
These filters (4) allow you to choose which field will be shown instead of the respondents' names. The "Blank"-option comes in handy in case of sensitive topics where you do not want to show exactly who answered what.
In addition to showing or hiding subtopics, it is possible to replace the colored Red-Amber-Green indicators with the corresponding maturity level.
And it is possible to add additional columns to the right of the Heat Map that indicate which Follow-On Projects (1) would be suitable to implement next: